Britney selling her house
Since it’s been a good half hour since the Britney/K-Fed synapse fired in your brain, we thought we’d bring you the latest.
In the wake of her divorce from Kevin Federline, Britney has decided not to sell photos of her two-month-old son for profit.
For months now, we’ve heard rumors that Britney Spears was going to be engaging in a little baby photo pimpery with new son Jayden James (basically, putting her children on the block, purring, “Hey honey, you lookin’ for a photo exclusive?” and seeing which publication rolls up and offers up the most cash).
Why the change of heart? Sources tell Women’s Wear Daily that it’s because of a clause in Spears’ prenuptial agreement which guarantees that K-Fed receives proceeds from all photos of their two children (he received the profits when the couple sold photos of their other son, Sean Preston, now 14 months, to People magazine last year for $1.5 million).
So what’s a Brit to do? She’s now planning to offer the pics up for free. Sources say Spears is aiming for a prestigious monthly or bimonthly, hoping to boost her image the way TomKat did with its Vanity Fair shoot featuring daughter Suri.
Meanwhile, the New York Post reports that she’s placed her eight-bedroom Malibu, California, mansion up for sale with an asking price of $13.5 million.























